Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lieutenant Charlie Feng

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Lieutenant Charlie Feng[edit]

The result was speedy delete as obvious hoax. Sam Blacketer (talk) 23:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It looks like an article about a fictional character and includes the same paragraph repeated over and over again. Another editor tagged it with db-bio which technically doesn't apply. (tag removed by creator) Bringing it here because it doesn't seem to fit any speedy category. Bollocks or "made up in school one day" would seem to apply. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:38, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete if it is not entirely made up then it is from an extremely unnotable piece of fiction as I have been unable to find anything what-so-ever about a Lieutenant "Charlie Feng". - Icewedge (talk) 23:52, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fiction, non-notable... 'twas generous to AfD this, I would have speedied it... brianlucas (talk) 23:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an article of a fictitious, non-notable ~~soldier~~ lieutenant. Alexius08 (talk) 00:26, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete With no context for this fictional character, it sounds like it qualifies for a G3 speedy as WP:MADEUP.Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:00, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable, doesn't really pass anything to make it worth saving. Wheres the sourcing? rootology (C)(T) 05:21, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per all the above. Fails notability. JavierMC 09:46, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete if it's a fictional character then db-nocontext; otherwise db-vandalism. JuJube (talk) 10:50, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no references, indication of any notability. Should probably have been speedied as nonsense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Horrorshowj (talk • contribs) 16:58, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's a proposal at WT:CSD for a new category that would cover articles like this. It's been described by one editor as "coherent nonsense". --Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:26, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete "was sent to China in the 2018 Pan-Asian War"!!! Probably a hoax? -- Magioladitis (talk) 23:19, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.