Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lie dection

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. Kusma (討論) 03:11, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lie dection[edit]

Seems to be nonsense. --Jacknstock 00:18, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is no more than a paraphrase of a very small part of a J.K.Rowling writing.--Anthony.bradbury 00:20, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Thanks for the info! I had no idea what the article was about. --Jacknstock 00:26, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Weak Pottercruft from someone who can't spell lie detection. - Fan1967 00:27, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - This is real nonsense. - Hahnch e n 00:44, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as per above. wikipediatrix 00:45, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per above. --Arnzy ^{(whats up?)} 01:29, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, patent nonsense. Article has been tagged. --Coredesat 01:34, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per above. -- Jared Hunt 01:45, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete, Pure gibberish DarkAudit 01:55, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete what the hell is this? Danny Lilithborne 02:01, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.