Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Licious

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I see a consensus to keep, even preceding the prior relist. As such, I am closing this as keep. While I doubt there will be any objection, anyone who might take issue with this closure is free to let me know. (non-admin closure) Shawn Teller (hy/hym) (talk) 03:40, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Licious[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

written like an advertisement Endrabcwizart (talk) 08:04, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep added third-party reliable sources for India's 29th unicorn.--Curvasingh (talk) 08:05, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Karnataka. AllyD (talk) 08:16, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:00, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the article isn't great, but it isn't blatantly promotional either. There is enough coverage even without considering the funding-announcement press releases. Walt Yoder (talk) 04:48, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I wouldn't agree the nominator on taking this article through AFD. The grammar and other minor copyediting should be addressed. The word "Lucious" is repetitive in most sentences which should be trimmed down to make it the article more encyclopaedic. Rejoy²⁰⁰³(talk) 06:54, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Doesn't seems like promotional. Nomadwikiholic (talk) 10:44, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 08:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for further input, even though consensus is already leaning towards "keep".
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:49, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Why is it a unicorn? Like a horse with a horn? Oaktree b (talk) 22:25, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oaktree b, it's a term from startup culture, see Unicorn (finance). Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:50, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.