Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libra Scale (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ne-Yo discography. Redirecting as a personal editorial decision. Consider this a keep close. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Libra Scale

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Libra Scale
• Articles for deletion/Libra Scale (2nd nomination)

Libra Scale (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable per WP:NALBUMS. there's no information here that could not be merged to the Artist's page. The album is several months from release and its singles are in infancy. Note this is it's second nomination (first one was a month ago) because it hasn't improved at all since then. Lil-unique1 (talk) 23:32, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

• Merge any verifiable information to Ne-Yo discography. I don't see significant coverage about this forthcoming album. -- Whpq (talk) 16:12, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

• Keep and close this discussion. The matter for this album was resolved less than a month ago. This is, in my opinion, a ridiculous nomination since it's so soon after the album was declared notable in the previous deletion discussion. Str8cash (talk) 22:58, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

• Comment, I beg to differ. This album is clearly not notable per WP:NALBUMS, it does not have confirmed release date, it does not have reliably sourced independent coverage and still has fact tags. Most of all there is not enough coverage to create a detailed/sizeable article. Regards, Lil-unique1 (talk) 23:03, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

• Keep per my comment in last AfD and per Str8cash. Has a confirmed release date. STAT -Verse 05:22, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

• Comment, please can someone explain to me what's the point of having a guideline which says "where there is not enough reliably sourced information an independent article should not be created" if then articles like Libra Scale are going to breach it and people are going to support the creation of such articles...? Regards, Lil-unique1 (talk) 16:13, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

• Keep it would be foolish not to. Think about it. Instead of wasting our time. Dr. Universe (talk) 18:43, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment - Do you have a reason based on Wikipedia policy and guidelines? Why would it be foolish to delete it? -- Whpq (talk) 18:48, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

• Keep no point deleting yetandycjp (talk) 12:37, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
• Merge/Redirect to Ne-Yo discography. Sorry, but I don't see anywhere enough significant coverage to justify an article at this time.--Michig (talk) 15:43, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.