Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liberation Games
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 04:27, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to be non-notable. No evidence that it meets criteria for either WP:CORP or WP:WEB but I'm open to input on this one. Crunch 00:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, a 'company' ran by a single person, that has made one game that isn't widely known. Nothing that any comp sci student hasn't done. If this qualifies per 'non-notable group of people', speedy it. - Bobet 01:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Ifnord 01:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Pintele Yid 02:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Arviragus 05:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not speedyable, I think, but still stubstub about a nn corpstub Segv11 (talk/contribs) 06:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Essexmutant 10:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete just nn. feydey 15:36, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn *\o/* Dustin McQuary *\o/* 19:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom. Ajwebb 22:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Werdna648T/C\@ 09:25, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.