Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liberated Christians

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:34, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Liberated Christians[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organization sourced only to the organization's website, unsourced claims of controversy, living people mentioned (though not by name, "founding couple"). Skyerise (talk) 16:10, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Pishcal — ♣ 16:17, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, nine years were enough to get at least a stub with some reliable/notable references. –Be..anyone (talk) 19:23, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete .... 9 years on and still no cite additions .... Clearly no evidence of notability and clearly fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 23:05, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I thought this would be a slam-dunk delete. It turns out this "not a church—not a swing club" has generated at least SOME sourcing (Phoenix New Times) that would count towards GNG. At least passing mention in BOOK What the Bible Says About Sex. It's a pretty close call, actually, but I feel this is short of the level of substantial independently published coverage we seek under GNG. Carrite (talk) 17:20, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.