Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liam The Leprechaun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:52, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Liam The Leprechaun[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fail WP:WEB and WP:FILM not a single WP:RS to be found. The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 00:57, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Annoying Orange per the page's history: appears to have previously been merged there twice. Strange Passerby (talk • contribs) 01:24, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Its massively WP:UNDUE there as it is and without WP:RS for Liam there is nothing to merge The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 02:04, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The YouTube video source as a reference. So, there is something to merge. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 03:52, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No we require secondary sources for something to be included on wikipedia. Outside the youtube page there is nothing The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 03:54, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As much as i know, there aren't any secondary sources. I googled and found nothing. I think we can do nothing else but delete the article. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 07:58, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 01:39, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No opinion on keeping/deleting, but don't merge to The Annoying Orange. It's just a few brief episodes - I reckon Tom Cruise (the broccolized version) had just as much time on the AO. If the character deserves mention, it's just this: mention, not UNDUE bulk merge. East of Borschov 09:14, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 23:46, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to a lack of independent sources to WP:verify notability. Would support merge in the alternative if it helps to produce a consensus. Shooterwalker (talk) 01:24, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.