Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liam Ferney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 18:41, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Liam Ferney[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. Ample opportunity has been given to provide further references. Does not meet any criteria listed at WP:CREATIVE. Shiftchange (talk) 04:34, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 08:51, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 08:51, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 08:51, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 09:23, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I am no poet, nor yet an Aussie; I search for Ferney, here's what I don't see: persuasive sources, article lacks them. My search did find the sources already on page, such as the non-profit, non-bluelinked http://cordite.org.au/tags/liam-ferney/ which interviewed Ferney in 2012 [1]. He once worked for them as an editor, so it may not be quite independent, but the more significant point is how big a deal is this and the other sources? It looks to me as though he had gained some recognition within the apparently very small world of literary poetry in Australia. And I don't think that is quite enough. If you have a way to show that he passes WP:CREATIVE, Flag me to take another look.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:37, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮JAaron95 ^Talk 18:18, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - references are either dead links, non-authoritative or written by journal of which subject used to be editor and hence is not neutral. No independent coverage to show notability.--Rpclod (talk) 03:10, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ Delete Changing my !vote because, as Rpclod pointed out, this poet did not actually win the award. Without that, the one independent review I found does not seem to be enough to establish notability. ABF99 (talk) 16:22, 16 August 2015 (UTC) -This poet did win a significant national poetry award in 2014, which qualifies him at least for notability in his country as per Wikipedia Any Bio guidelines. He is also reviewed here. I don't think we can expect the same amount of coverage for a poet as for other kinds of 'notables.' ) unsigned comment added by ABF99 (talk • contribs) 06:32, 15 August 2015 (UTC) [reply]
- According to the Wikipedia site for the prize, the subject was on the shortlist for, but did not win, the prize.--Rpclod (talk) 12:50, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Rpclod You are right. I stand corrected. ABF99 (talk) 14:00, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.