Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liam Burbridge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete all. Johnleemk | Talk 06:46, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Liam Burbridge, Technobangman, The Royal Filipino Under Aged Vegetarian Society

Patent nonsense, I think it's been deleted before. Pretty funny though, I'd suggest BJAODN. Eixo 12:06, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, added Technobangman and The Royal Filipino Under Aged Vegetarian Society to the same afd. - Bobet 13:22, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all for being nonsense. - Bobet 13:22, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Could be speedied if it's been deleted before. --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 14:28, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Jokes TigerShark 00:37, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Technobangman, delete the others. Technobangman has definitely been deleted before - quite recently (I nominated it). David Johnson [T|C] 00:40, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged Technobangman for a speedy, it has been deleted before. TigerShark 00:53, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like Liam Burbridge has been deleted before too - I just found (and tagged) an orphaned talk page at Talk:Liam burbridge (note small b). David Johnson [T|C] 00:56, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Technobangman is somewhat different from what was deleted but recognisably the same organisation. There were not many votes on its AfD though. Liam burbridge was speedied. So it is reasonable to complete this process in respect of Burbridge, and at least defensible to leave Technobangman for now. If this AfD ends in a substantial consensus to delete then I will watch the pages, with a view to speedying any reposts and possible protection, and told the user so here. Will that do? - Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 12:32, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I'd just like to see that whole lot speedily deleted due to my previous involvement in the original Technobangman AfD which sparked the creation of these nonsense pages (we're the facists btw, for deleting the original Technobangman article). The user concerned repeatedly vandalised the AfD page, made personal and general attacks against the voters and used multiple accounts so as to deter detection of their vandalism. I strongly suspect the newly-created User:Skillman100 is also User:Liamcb and User:82.110.149.183. It just annoys me to see someone using Wikipedia in this manner. David Johnson [T|C] 16:18, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It annoys me, too. I'm sure if this were anything other than my first day as an admin I'd have nuked them straight away; any other admins stumbling across this may feel inclined to do so. On the other hand the other AfD got few votes; if this counts a goodly number it will make future enforcement completely uncontentious (in my view - but what do I know?) - Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 16:56, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Borderline nonsense, hovering on the verges of attack, unreferenced, largely unverifiable, and very evidently failing WP:BIO/WP:CORP. - Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 12:32, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Liam Burbridge speedied. Delete the rest. howch e ng {chat} 19:05, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
BJAODN and delete. Stifle 20:05, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dont you think nuking us over a website would be a bit silly. Did'nt you learn anything from Hiroshima. Anyway you need a war decleration and in most cases, a nuclear attack would waarant an approval from the UN. And you'd probably just end up affecting yourself. Gaylord. Think before you nuke, thats what i always say. And btw, Liam CB is not skillman100, I am skillman 100. Why is it not plausible that he can have a friend with the same sense of humour? As for attacks on individuals, id like to make it clear that we never made the first move. We were ridiculed by certain users randomly for no reason, particular David Johnson, which i particularly find offensive. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.110.149.183 (talk • contribs) .

i think that you should maybe get out more. btw the facists were not you, the facists were very strong men oppressing people of ethnic origin. and i overcame them single handedly. do not sully my triumph! i am a reformed man and, as i said to robert mugabe when i looked him straight in the eye, IGNORANCE LEADS TO FEAR, FEAR LEADS TO ANGER, ANGER LEADS TO HATE, HATE LEADS TO SUFFERING. if this has the same effect on you than it did on bobby m you will be crying in shame now. to clarify, i am not a sad person who sits alone on the internet creating people and masturbating over bestiality. i am an ARTIST. thank you,
liam x x x
ps i would like to ask David Johnson if he has a life outside of wikipedia? maybe a job? friends? family? if so, maybe he could spend his time on this outside life rather than being a colossal prick. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Liamcb (talk • contribs) .

Note to others: there is no need to remove any of the above attacks against me under WP:CIVIL. Not only is it rather amusing, but it illustrates my above points quite well. People are free to browse the original AfD page to look for evidence of people being ridiculed. David Johnson [T|C] 14:12, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.