Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lia (artist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:59, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lia (artist)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Concerned that this artist may not meet our general notability guidelines, let alone our WP:ARTIST guidelines. Perhaps others will prove me wrong - which would be great, if not, it is just no the right time. Has been tagged with notability concerns since 2010. Missvain (talk) 06:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. She's admittedly hard to search for, but is highly influential in the digital art world. Here's her profile in the Archive of Digital Art. She's been covered and interviewed by Vice's The Creators Project, this Wired blurb is already in the article; you can find her pieces discussed in a number of online curatorial/media outlets (eg Alpha.ville, Cronica, Rhizome); her CV documents quite a few major exbihitions. You can't really see the snippets, but her work is discussed quite a bit in this and this book on digital art. Not a topic area that gets a lot of traditional print coverage, but within her field she's very well-recognized. Opabinia regalis (talk) 19:18, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:40, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:26, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.