Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Li Wenjun
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. v/r - TP 14:19, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Li Wenjun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability has been in question since May 2009. Google search yields no reliable sources Ryan Vesey Review me! 14:07, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Tentative delete. It is possible that there are reliable sources in Chinese, but I can't find any in English. Regarding notability all I have to go by is his website, which provides no indication that he meets any of the WP:CREATIVE criteria. He is early in his career and has only a handful of completed works at this point, none of which (with no disrespect to Mr. Li) appears to be anything out of the ordinary. If reliable sources turn up stating otherwise, I'm willing to reconsider. Camerafiend (talk) 01:35, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Google and Yahoo didn't provide any good sources in their search, at least in the English language that is. SwisterTwister talk 03:54, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. —Michaela den (talk) 13:01, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per per WP:BIO. Beagel (talk) 19:59, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.