Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Li Huang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:43, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Li Huang[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Queried speedy delete Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:07, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 23:09, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 23:09, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 23:09, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 23:09, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. For the record, while articles under this title have been deleted three times before, none of the prior deleted versions were about the same person that this version is about. (The only one to go through AfD was included in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qiao Liang (Three Kingdoms) and pertained to a person who lived 1,800 years before this Li Huang.) --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:03, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose With apologies for causing so much trouble for all! ch (talk) 06:21, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment What is the reason? Timmyshin (talk) 08:29, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- This appears to have been a procedural AfD nomination because the article creator originally requested speedy deletion per CSD G7 when the article was accidentally moved to the user space. However, that issue has already been resolved, so we should close this AfD.--Khanate General ☪ talk ^{project mongol conquests} 13:02, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes -- the article I mistakenly created in userspace was deleted, and thanks for that. But I did not request that the present article be deleted!ch (talk) 20:44, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.