Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leysingi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Daniel (talk) 20:35, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Leysingi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:REDUNDANTFORK, WP:DICTIONARY, WP:1S. See also Thrall § Society. Jay D. Easy (t) 17:32, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Jay D. Easy (t) 17:32, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:39, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Satisfies GNG. This topic has received signficant coverage in books and periodical articles in Google Books, Google Scholar, JSTOR, the Internet Archive and elsewhere. There are, in particular, entire periodical articles on this subject, such as: [1]. The article can be expanded beyond a definition. Since the topic is notable, the article is not redundant, quite apart from the fact that a freed former slave is not the same thing as a slave. James500 (talk) 23:38, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per WP:GNG. Per significant coverage in litterature and mentions on internet.BabbaQ (talk) 08:46, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. At worst, merge, but certainly not outright delete. Srnec (talk) 01:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.