Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Letterkenny Residents Party

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:30, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Letterkenny Residents Party

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is another one flagged by Guliolopez and I agree that it has not established WP:ORG. This party contested two elections: the 2009 Letterkenny Town Council election (successfully) and the 2014 Donegal County Council election (unsuccessfully). It was created in 2008 ahead of the 2009 election and dissolved in 2015 after the 2014. There's nothing to suggest that it was anything other a branding exercise for Tom Crossan's brief political career. I've added a note on both election pages. There's something similar on the 1985 Waterford Corporation election page for the Waterford People's Party and on 2009 Fingal County Council election for the Seniors Solidarity Party, and seems a good way of handling localised parties with a fleeting existence. Iveagh Gardens (talk) 16:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Ireland. Iveagh Gardens (talk) 16:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Spleodrach (talk) 17:44, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:00, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 13:09, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom - did a quick check of my own, as this was only a vague "heard of on the radio topic" and just don't find backing to reach minimum policy requirements (ORG, GNG, VER, etc.). SeoR (talk) 14:31, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. So minor you'd need a microscope to detect traces of its former mayfly existence. Insufficiently notable. Spideog (talk) 21:52, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.