Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lethal Lady

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Kubigula (talk) 06:04, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lethal Lady

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This aircraft is insufficiently notable to merit an independent article. While it should be mentioned in the General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon article, it fails WP:GNG to standalone - and, also, might well be surpassed in its claim to fame (most hours flown). The aircraft equivalent of WP:BLP1E? The Bushranger _{One ping only} 11:50, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 11:51, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 11:51, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete doesnt appear to be that notable, might be worth a mention in the aircraft on display section of the F-16 article but not a stand-alone. MilborneOne (talk) 16:37, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This aircraft does not strike me as having done something noteworthy, there's no sign of it ever having made an individual impact unlike most aircraft with dedicated articles. Kyteto (talk) 01:45, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and the above comments. Nick-D (talk) 03:02, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nomination, this aircraft doesn't seem notable enough to warrant its own article. Anotherclown (talk) 13:13, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; might be notable within the F-16 community, but in the wider world it's non-notable. --Sp33dyphil ©^hat_ontributions 04:07, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.