Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Let You Go
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:22, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Let You Go[edit]
- Let You Go (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article fails to demonstrate the notability of its subject, and was previously deleted via prod for the same reason. KhalfaniKhaldun 20:56, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Why it fails on the notability? It's a single that will be released in the future... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucas tkof (talk • contribs) 21:10, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- From WP:NSONGS: "Most songs do not rise to notability for an independent article... a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." KhalfaniKhaldun 03:50, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails notability per WP:MUSIC#Songs & WP:CRYSTAL. No awards, no chart, no covers, no WP:RS.
Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 00:51, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It didn't receive any award, it still didn't chart anywhere, the cover wasn't leaked yet. The only reliable source able for me is iTunes, but you do not accept it. So the only proof to date is the music video. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucas tkof (talk • contribs)
- Delete: notability yet to be demonstrated, WP:CRYSTAL. JamesBurns (talk) 10:53, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note – This user has been blocked for sock puppetry and vote-stacking at AfDs. List of Confirmed sock puppets of User:JamesBurns Untick (talk) 14:02, 21 April 2009 (UTC) [reply]
- Delete. Non-charting song, didn't win any significant awards and lack of coverage from reliable sources. — Σxplicit 05:14, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.