Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Let's Go (2010 G-20 Summit song)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 18:33, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Let's Go (2010 G-20 Summit song)[edit]

Let's Go (2010 G-20 Summit song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Please see WP:NSONG: this promotional song may have charted (but #106 on the Gaon chart isn't all that great), but such articles need to pass the GNG first, and this one doesn't. It's here as a. a good reason to list a bunch of YouTube versions of the song; b. list a plethora of supposedly involved artists; and thus c. function as filler for those artists' individual templates (see Template:Kim Jonghyun, for instance). Drmies (talk) 17:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA1000 18:54, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA1000 18:54, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONG. This wasn't even a regular single for sale, it was given out at the Asia Song Festival that year for a 1000KRW (~1USD) donation to UNICEF. Guess they counted those as "sales." It falls in the same category as the tourism-promoting songs. And yes, this article is being used to claim independent notability for nearly everyone who participated in it as well as fill up their templates. Shinyang-i (talk) 03:52, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 02:36, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.