Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leslie Kiernan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 18:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leslie Kiernan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Both positions this person has held are non-notable. KidAd • SPEAK 18:11, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:01, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:18, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I didn't found sufficient coverage that meets general notability guidelines. Rondolinda (talk) 18:05, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete government official below the level of actual notability and the coverage of Kiernan is not enough to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:33, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Looks like a WP:TOOSOON situation; no substantive coverage yet. For future reference, the only legitimate coverage I could find on Leslie Kiernan were two press releases from the White House and the Department of Commerce: [1], [2]. Suriname0 (talk) 03:17, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No significant Coverage found and not pass general notability guidelines. TheDreamBoat (talk) 06:42, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. She has not held any political office that confers automatic notability under WP:NPOL, but the article is not getting her over WP:GNG on the sourcing — it's based entirely on primary source content self-published by Kiernan and her own employer, with no evidence of journalistic coverage about her in reliable sources independent of her. Bearcat (talk) 16:35, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.