Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Les Dégonflés
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep, nomination by indef-banned sock. Non-admin close. Jfire (talk) 17:39, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Les Dégonflés (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
not notable Viewplain1990 (talk) 00:52, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Perfectly notable, and sourced from two reliable sources. --Eastmain (talk) 01:06, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 01:06, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Its sourced with realiabe sources but the coverage isn't substantial. The articles about them are more human interest-cute stories then real articles that make them notable. The group and its shtick will probably be gone before you know it. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 01:48, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Keep. The article is well referenced, citing prominent anglophone magazines, Wired and The Times, demonstrating international notability. They may fall out of notability in the future, but that's difficult to speculate. At its current state, I !vote keep. Billscottbob (talk) 04:24, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. The nom has been previously accused of using sock puppets in AfDs. Billscottbob (talk) 04:33, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, it needs expansion and some clarification and could do without the forum links, but English RS coverage includes The Guardian, Observer and Wired, in addition to those sourced within the article and some French language sources. TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 04:34, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.