Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lepa Jankovic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Biblioworm 01:06, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lepa Jankovic[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the notability criteria. Local law enforcement official really only notable for one criminal investigation, which is mentioned in one sentence of this short article. The rest is just fluff about people she has met or comments people have made about her. Kelly ^hi! 16:43, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As above, fails notability criteria. As for why this was created "people she has met" = Tara Teng. AusLondonder (talk) 21:54, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 22:28, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 22:28, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep: Looks like a number of sources and stopping human trafficking is an important topic; I'd like to see expansion, so let's see if it can be improved. Montanabw ^(talk) 23:07, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete poor women was just doing her job when she met Tara Teng and that fame brushed off on her. Legacypac (talk) 12:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Jeez, non-notable. BMK (talk) 15:20, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. 99% of the article is not even about her. Softlavender (talk) 10:19, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Softlavender is right; the references to her are so trivial that the article isn't even about her - she's a police officer, and not even one in a public capacity; this is a hot mess. The Drover's Wife (talk) 01:30, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.