Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonid the Magnificent (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 04:22, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leonid the Magnificent[edit]

Leonid the Magnificent (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of citations in references for information given, as most are primary sources; the article fails to include secondary sources, which increases the question of it conforming to WP:RS and WP:GNG GUtt01 (talk) 16:27, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 16:56, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 16:56, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 16:56, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 16:56, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the subject has made multiple talent show appearances and I see a small amount of coverage for performances elsewhere. Nevertheless I don’t see that they have anything resembling significant roles, 2,190 Instagram followers doesn’t amount to a cult following, and I don’t see that they have made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment, so does not pass WP:ENT. Mccapra (talk) 03:21, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 03:07, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eternal Shadow Talk 16:32, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Those sources do appear don't add up to establishing notability, with a lack of reliable sources that focus specifically on him Dexxtrall (talk) 21:40, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.