Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lenine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep; all four of the "delete" !votes were due to a copyvio, which has now been removed. Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 23:46, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lenine[edit]

That's not an Wikipedia-article, reads like copy&paste. IMHO it's not possible to wikify this here. Should be deleted Hedwig in Washington ^(TALK) 10:13, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I've got rid of the massive MTV-Unplugged text dump (although someone is welcome to re-add it in a more judicious manner) and had a quick run-through with a wikification pencil on the rest. The subject of the artist is verifiable and appears notable. Certainly the album "Falange Canibal" got press attention, and I'd expect that the same is true of the rest of his discography. A lusophone editor should be able to shed more light on this, but there doesn't look anything wrong with it now. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 10:34, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Agent 86 00:27, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, seems notable by cursory Google search. Adding Allmusic, etc. links. --Dhartung | Talk 02:58, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, BigHaz cleaned up the problems with this article. Hagerman^(talk) 07:08, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Apparently the article has been cleaned up a little, and at this point, it definitely should be kept. SupaStarGirl 15:08, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep yeah pretty notable, on amazon too. — Seadog 16:36, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per allmusic entry. | Mr. Darcy talk 16:37, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete as a copyvio of this page. No prejudice for a non-copyvio recreation however. ---J.S ^(T/C) 18:10, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Clear copyvio as above. Virtually word for word. --Anthony.bradbury 19:33, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per copy vio.. Baristarim 19:49, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE Doesn't matter if it was 'cleaned up', the remaining info is still a copyvio. Seen more than one good article deleted because of this kind of lazy copy/paste editing. --Brian ^{(How am I doing?)} 22:35, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment as far as the copyvios go, I've done the best I can (just now) to work around that. I'm hampered by a lack of experience with the man's music (or familiarity with Portuguese sources), so if anyone else can paraphrase things better they're welcome to join in. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 22:43, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep There don't appear to be any more copyvios from the pages cited in this discussion page surviving. It looks like we can keep it now.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.