Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lena Ingelsrudøya

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 17:28, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lena Ingelsrudøya[edit]

Lena Ingelsrudøya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL by not playing in a FPL or senior international football. Fails WP:GNG as well. Her death had some media reports but as she wasn't notable in the first place it's irrelevant. Dougal18 (talk) 19:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 19:23, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 19:23, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:39, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:40, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:40, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:40, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – it's a sad story, but there is not enough significant coverage to meet GNG. I can find about a half dozen articles, all brief mentions, and the most expansive ones are about her tragic death. If we were to write an article about her, it would look like the one we have, and be mostly about how she died, and that's not appropriate for an encyclopedia. More importantly, the subject simply doesn't meet notability criteria for inclusion. Fails NFOOTY, fails GNG, delete. Levivich 22:26, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete based on the timing seems to fail WP:MEMORIAL. SportingFlyer T·C 06:17, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - fails WP:GNG, WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:NOTMEMORIAL. GiantSnowman 08:58, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Illogical nomination: there wouldn't be any coverage of her death unless she was notable in the first place! There is clearly extensive, non-routine coverage in national and international media. We can't pretend it is all "irrelevant". As with Katharina Lindner (another who would 'fail' the crackpot WP:NFOOTBALL), the scale of coverage of her untimely death underscores her notability rather than detracting from it. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 12:02, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    ...but the link you provide is 12 sentences. "Extensive"? Levivich 16:24, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Because news sources report on normal people dying, and we are WP:NOTNEWS. GiantSnowman 13:36, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. As far as I can tell, the only coverage is of her unfortunate death, which isn't enough to meet WP:GNG. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:45, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.