Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leigh Valentine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:14, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Leigh Valentine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to satisfy our notability criteria. The only reliable independent secondary sources I could find say that she had a messy divorce from Robert Tilton and that she led a prayer at a Trump rally last spring. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 20:01, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:26, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:28, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:29, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:29, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:30, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete She is a background supporter of a lot of causes, but being in the background generally means non-notable. Her winning the state Miss USA competition is also not a sign of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:58, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I searched, since bio indicated that there might be notability out there, somewhere, but there isn't. Nom and Johnpacklambert have this exactly right.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:48, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete unable to locate significant coverage on Gale. Dloh cierekim 21:11, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dlohcierekim, who is Gale? --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 21:50, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Gale (publisher), a publisher of reference books and databases, formerly known as the Gale Group, then Thomson Gale." They have a large collection of reference materials. I have access via my library. I saw a banner notification over my watchlist saying they were offering free access to a limited number of editors.65.35.179.54 (talk) 22:04, 4 May 2017 (UTC) oops, logged out by power failure. Dloh cierekim 22:05, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.