Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lehman, Lee & Xu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 03:34, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lehman, Lee & Xu[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ok, it is a Law Firm, however the article fails to establish notability, the references fails WP:V, the article fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 03:50, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:30, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:30, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I only found trivial mentions and press releases. SL93 (talk) 23:14, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lehman, Lee & Xu is notable as the 8th private Law Firm to be opened in the PRC. Also, the references are corrected and come from reliable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.251.7.60 (talk) 03:02, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Only the 8th? Maybe 1st or 2nd, but being 8th does not confer notability. Non-notable only mentions in non RS or mentions in passing ie The firm is named as filing suit for someone. Caffeyw (talk) 10:45, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.