Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lehigh Valley Storm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. -- Scott Burley (talk) 22:12, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lehigh Valley Storm

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article deleted from PROD then restored with no rationale for restoration. Organization does not pass WP:GNG or any other notability standard I can find. Sources in article violate WP:COI and appears to have WP:ADV issues as well. Wikipedia is not a free web hosting server. Paul McDonald (talk) 18:43, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Paul McDonald (talk) 18:44, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 19:36, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 19:36, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep subject is WP:GNG. in addition I add WP:NOTCLEANUP Lubbad85 (☎) 19:52, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Please provide examples of WP:GNG and explain how WP:NOTCLEANUP applies here. Otherwise, your comments are not a reason, just a vote. AFD is a discussion, not a ballot.--Paul McDonald (talk) 22:38, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:42, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:00, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - My WP:BEFORE turned up multiple mentions of this team online in news articles ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ). This includes regional/state-level publications (the NJ Herald, The NY Daily News, PennLive). A lot of this is match reports which do not feature a great deal of information about the team, but I think there's enough in aggregate to just get this semi-professional team over the bar for notability per WP:ORG. FOARP (talk) 15:34, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Draft Shift into draftspace, not quite enough notability/sources to warrant a Wikipedia page at this moment in time. Cheesy McGee (talk) 12:50, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per a review of FOARP's sources. SportingFlyer T·C 17:39, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.