Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legend Maker
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:50, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Legend Maker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There is no coverage to prove this band is notable. The article is also written in poor English and there are POV problems with it. I would prefer it to be speedy deleted, but considering that the creator keeps on recreating it, a discussion will be better. JDDJS (talk) 23:01, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per nom, not notable. Has been speedy deleted before with no changes. Karl 334 ☞TALK to ME ☜ 23:04, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:45, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:37, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable per WP:MUSIC. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:09, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - does not appear to meet WP:BAND; unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources. Gongshow Talk 06:32, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.