Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Left Opportunists
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 11:29, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Left Opportunists[edit]
This article had been listed with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/US Imperialism. By popular demand, I am splitting it into its own AFD. To the closing admin, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/US Imperialism for others who may have expressed an opinion on it. BigDT 12:31, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- No sources, no proper article, no point. Delete. Vizjim 14:53, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I originally thought this was from Mao's Little Red Book, from the 1940s. No context and little useful content. I put a "prod" on this article at one point. --John Nagle 15:53, 15 May 2006 (UTC)~[reply]
- Strong delete per nom and above. 1652186 18:17, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all POV no V. --Eivindt@c 22:23, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per everyone above. Only 278 Google hits for "Left opportunism", not sure if this could ever be truly NPOV. ergot 02:25, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to wiktionary.Tomb Ride My Talk 15:34, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete as per above. --Strothra 00:59, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete basically a dicdef (and anything further would run into OR/V issues). Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:54, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.