Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leetul Gogoi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. consensus seems clear enough DGG ( talk ) 08:32, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Leetul Gogoi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. I believe that this is a case of WP:BLP1E and NOTNEWS. The individual is likely to remain a low profile individual (criteria 2) but his role appears to be well documented, possibly a case of NOTNEWS Gbawden (talk) 09:32, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move to "2017 Kashmir human shield incident" or equivalent. The individual in question is not notable: the incident has received too much attention to dismiss as "NOTNEWS". Vanamonde (talk) 10:17, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:38, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:38, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move/Redirect - I agree with Vanamonde93. For Gogoi himself, it is WP:TOOSOON, but the incident itself is notable. Smmurphy^(Talk) 21:22, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:21, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I dont see anything noteworthy in his career to warrant a stand-alone article, the incident seem trivial as well. MilborneOne (talk) 17:37, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- a nn person involved in an incident that does not seem to be notable enough itself. WP:BIO1E applies. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:27, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Where to redirect/merge to or what to rename this article to exactly if consensus is not to delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 10:13, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:BIO, seems a case of WP:1E. DrStrauss talk 06:46, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.