Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leeds Valley Park (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Goodman UK#Leeds Valley Park. Redirect as merge is already done. ♠PMC(talk) 23:49, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Leeds Valley Park[edit]

Leeds Valley Park (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A directory-like page on an unremarkable business park. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is hyper-local and / or routine notices. Does not meet WP:NCORP. Created by Special:Contributions/Mbrowne85 with few other contributions outside this topic, as part of an apparent walled garden around Goodman UK.

First AfD closed as no consensus; sources presented there were not convincing, being of the same routing / WP:SPIP added) variery. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:25, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I would be fine with a redirect. --K.e.coffman (talk) 04:51, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:17, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:17, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@The joy of all things:: Sorry I was unclear. It stands for WP:SPIP (self-promotional sources). K.e.coffman (talk) 00:55, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:41, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The article looks to be outdated as it appears that it was sold by Goodman in 2014 (insidermedia.com). There are several sites that describe it as award-winning but don’t say which award(s) – all I found was a 2010 BALI National Landscape Award for the sites maintenance company (gracelandscapes.com), and there are also a couple of local awards for landscape: Yorkshire in Bloom 2012 and the Leeds Architecture Awards 2006 – however these do not appear to be enough to establish notability. EdwardUK (talk) 11:43, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpgjhpjm 02:01, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, unremarkable business park, not tiny, not big, not notable. Szzuk (talk) 07:27, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.