Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leeds United A.F.C. Reserves and Youth Team season 2008-09

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 09:45, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Leeds United A.F.C. Reserves and Youth Team season 2008-09

Season articles should only be created for professional teams in professional leagues per WP:FOOTY and previous AfD for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aldershot Town 1992-93. On a general note, I think some policy guidance should be created on what levels can be created for football season articles. Peanut4 (talk) 11:52, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Peanut4 (talk) 11:55, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Yes, we should create some guidelines. -- Alexf⁴² 11:57, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable. Latics (talk) 12:05, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. – Pee Jay 12:05, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - extremely unencyclopedic detail considering this is only the reserves -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:07, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, agree with the above. Punkmorten (talk) 19:12, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - season articles are only suitable for senior teams playing at the highest level of their sport. TerriersFan (talk) 19:22, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. BanRay 09:56, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I can understand the reasons. Would it be suitable to include just the appearances/goals states in the main article for the reserves and youth team or still not notable enough? I cannot see what damage it could do if included in another corresponding article. T1v37r (talk) 22:36, 3 October 2008 (GMT)

I'm not sure. I doubt it would merit inclusion per WP:NOT#STATS though. Peanut4 (talk) 17:48, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I see no reason to cover reserve teams. TerriersFan (talk) 17:52, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.