Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Pak Hang Patrick

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Pak Hang Patrick[edit]

Lee Pak Hang Patrick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Aside from the first sentence, everything is copied/pasted verbatim from the article Chu Tien-hsin, who cannot possibly be the same person. Every single reference is about Chu Tien-hsin (also romanized as Zhu Tianxin). This writer, "Lee Pak Hang", does seem to exist, but it's unclear to me how notable he is. Page is orphaned. Timmyshin (talk) 23:30, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:29, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:29, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:51, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Apparent hoax. DGG ( talk ) 05:11, 14 November 2016 (UTC) Ref. 2 is clearly bout Chu Tien-hsin, not about her. DGG ( talk ) 05:11, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Deleteas everything here simply confirms an attempt at making an article seem genuine, when it is in fact simply copied from another subject, not this one, and the sources are also mirroring this. SwisterTwister talk 05:25, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. As per WP:HOAX. --FuzzyGopher (talk) 18:33, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.