Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Mountain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:55, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Mountain[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Small and not notable hill, even though it has a name and therefore also a namesake. Delete per WP:HOLE. Geschichte (talk) 17:41, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 April 25. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:56, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:04, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:04, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indication of notability for bulk-produced place article. Unfortunately there are tens of thousands of these lacking substance beyond mere tables of place names. Reywas92^Talk 21:16, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I would definitely know a mountain from a hole in the ground. But there doesn't seem to be anything documenting this mountain in depth that I can find. Uncle G (talk) 22:59, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.