Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Kelso

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn‎. The lack of sig coverage is addressed now. But the article now needs a total rewrite only having information supported by the sources. (non-admin closure) X (talk) 09:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Kelso

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article. The only pre-wiki sig coverage I could find is a WSJ article (which is also not solely about him, but his company-related investments). Even searching today, the subject does not appear to have any in-depth coverage whatsoever. Being an anchor for TV stations does not automatically inherit notability. I checked via Newspapers.com and Wikipedia Library, and couldn't find any printed sources that discuss him. All available online, and in print, were passing mentions focusing on the TV programs, and mentioning him as the anchor. X (talk) 09:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Journalism, and Television. X (talk) 09:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The problem here, Xoak, is that Fort Wayne newspapers are not in Newspapers.com. They are in databases TWL does not provide, namely GenealogyBank/NewsBank. There are some longer pieces, but it would take a lot for me to keep a page on an anchor in a sub-100 DMA. Take a look at what I've hauled up and tell me if I need to dig up more: [1]; [2] + [3] Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:47, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sammi Brie, These are wonderful sources. Kudos for digging up. So much so that I'd be willing to withdrew my nomination now. Tho the article needs a trim and should only have information with newly provided inline citations. X (talk) 08:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.