Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ledenair

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was early closing per WP:SNOWBALL, delete as apparent hoax. -- Karada 13:05, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ledenair[edit]

No airline of this name flies from Heathrow or Although clever they are seeded comments all round the internet including entries in the romania wikGatwick, the website provided doesn't resolve, the only trace of a website is on this freewebs page. Mentions are scattered across the web, but nothing authoritative, and they frequently bear a variation of the "chief executive"'s name like this review. This page (WARNING:Attempts to load malware) mentions the chief exec and appears to be a site for people to design new airlines - I suspect this may be a project which hasn't gotten off the ground yet (sorry!) but I'd like other opinions (hence putting it here, rather than prodding) --kateshortforbob 19:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC) kateshortforbob 19:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, hoax. Said user has released presumably self-made logos to the public domain. Axem Titanium 19:38, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete , obvious hoax. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 19:48, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong deleteNon existant website - obvious hoax, and besides, as Axem points out, no airline would ever release its logo under the GFDL. Iain99 19:51, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
speedy delete as hoax - full hoax if "one of the largest airlines in teh UK" and doesn't fly to two of the largest airports. --Rocksanddirt 20:30, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete, I'm quite certain this is not a member of the Star Alliance, and sure enough they're not even listed as Regional Members on their website. Hoax. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 20:38, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a hoax. MilborneOne 20:59, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Most probably a hoax. Even if not, and is a startup company, fails WP:ORG. --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (tαlk) 21:39, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, and also delete Air rouge and Blu xpress by the same author. £3.5 bn turnover, no press coverage, and a spelling mistake in their logo? C'mon. -- Karada 22:20, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - See [1] and [2]. It is a fantasy airline. - Spryde 22:21, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Hoax - Obvious hoax - doesn't google with e.g. Reuters which basically means it don't exist. Ttiotsw 14:15, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.