Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Led Sobrepeña III

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:44, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Led Sobrepeña III[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:NACTOR. Has had no significant roles. I found zero hits on Google News. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 05:01, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Philippines. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 05:01, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Here's a SAS.

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
Source assessment table:
https://www.pep.ph/guide/tv/2255/the-singing-bee-season-1-produced-three-millionaires			Just a mere mention; no significant role in the show	✘ No
https://ph.linkedin.com/pub/dennis-garcia-arce/a3/576/831	?	LinkedIn	?	✘ No
https://web.facebook.com/SARISARIChannelPh/videos/823302081147021/	?	Facebook		✘ No
https://www.facebook.com/MinutePHL/videos/712454192113852/	?	Facebook (again)		✘ No
https://twitter.com/CamillePrats/status/	?	Twitter	? "Hmm...this page doesn’t exist. Try searching for something else."	✘ No
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1933831/	?	IMDb		✘ No
https://web.archive.org/web/20101011151846/http://showbizandstyle.inquirer.net/entertainment/entertainment/view/20101007-296521/A-funny-superhero			Mere mention (again)	✘ No
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1444692/fullcredits?ref_=tt_cl_sm#cast	?	IMDb (again)		✘ No
https://www.pep.ph/guide/indie/5070/baklas-human-organs-for-sale-inspired-by-true-incidents-in-tondo		~	? ^{[dead link]}	? Unknown
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

—hueman1 (talk • contributions) 05:15, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Source analysis is wonderful. There isn't much of anything else I find, fails GNG and ACTOR. Nothing significant found for RS. Oaktree b (talk) 14:23, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - zero hits for me as well. Likely COI/AUTOBIO as well as the article creator has spent the overwhelming majority of their 8 years on Wikipedia making edits to this article only. This article is based purely on WP:OR and self-published sources so the whole thing needs to go. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:37, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Good ref assessment --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:BIO per nom. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE. SBKSPP (talk) 01:45, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.