Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LeaseTrade.com
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel Bryant 08:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
LeaseTrade.com[edit]
- LeaseTrade.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Appears to fail WP:WEB. Also largely reads like an advertisement. ghits: [1] NMChico24 06:48, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This is not meant as an advertisement, rather a notation about a related website and a definition of lease assumptions. Please note, an article specifically defining "lease assumptions" will be authored shortly. mattmcg
- The issue is not so much it sounding like an advertisement, that was just a secondary comment. The main problem is conforming to WP:WEB. To be acceptable, the article needs to cite sources that establish how the site is notable to make it clear why an article should exist. You can also read WP:NOT for more information about what is inappropriate for Wikipedia. --NMChico24 07:14, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I will be updating this again tomorrow. There are credible second sources that cite LeaseTrade.com as notable for a number of reasons (e.g. one of the original websites that pioneered the concept). mattmcg
- Delete. I'm not only working with WP:WEB, I'm hedging on WP:CORP - doesn't appear to be very notable here. --Dennisthe2 16:28, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Would be nice to keep but its not a notable company and also I think it fails WP:WEB] --PrincessBrat 18:12, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails to explain notability. Corvus cornix 19:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete - another wonderful, self written advert. Rgds, - Trident13 20:17, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.