Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lean Construction Institute
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 03:47, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Lean Construction Institute (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Insignificant organisation with no coverage in mainstream media. And anyway, the whole article is a load of advertising. JJLiu112 (talk) 14:22, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. JJLiu112 (talk) 14:22, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I did my own search and all I am seeing is press release/cursory coverage, nothing that I would describe as significant or in-depth. Fails Wikipedia:NBUSINESS due to lack of available sources. Jo7hs2 (talk) 14:29, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio giuliano 16:27, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.