Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leah Coombes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:00, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Leah Coombes

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actress, Other than BFI there's nothing confirming she's been in any of these shows and there's nothing on her in Google News at all,

I did manage to find her Family Affairs character/name mentioned on the Archived website Five(https://web.archive.org/web/20040831031151/http://www.five.tv/) however no page url is provided (you have to click 4-5 different links to get there!)

Fails NACTOR & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 19:24, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 22:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 22:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 22:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as A7. Trillfendi (talk) 15:32, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it is long past time we stopped allowing these articles sourced only to a non-reliable source to stand.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- How did such a adysmally sourced article survive for 14 years?John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Very good question, I guess late's better than never!, Admittedly I would've liked to adequately source it and bring it up to standards however you cannot source an article if there's no sources on that subject. –Davey2010^Talk 17:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NACTOR KidAd talk 06:07, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lack of significant independant coverage. -Kj cheetham (talk) 15:50, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reliable sources that cover her directly or in depth. Lausapwow (talk) 04:53, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet WP:NACTOR.Expertwikiguy (talk) 08:05, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.