Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leaf Trading Cards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:43, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leaf Trading Cards

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relies too much on Primary sources Villkomoses (talk) 14:30, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Games, Companies, American football, Baseball, Basketball, Football, Ice hockey, Tennis, Wrestling, and Texas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:15, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 15:56, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment That's not a valid deletion rationale. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 17:51, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not seem to pass WP:NCORP, no independent sources discussing the company. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:17, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Piotr. Cbl62 (talk) 17:51, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This has been one of the major sports card companies for awhile now. Here are some sources: [1][2][3][4][5] While these sources aren't strictly about Leaf, they do go into some detail about the company. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 19:31, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: An analysis of the sources presented by WikiOriginal-9 would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 15:01, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per significant, independent coverage provided by WikiOriginal-9 which establishes notability. Frank Anchor 13:27, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't think the newspaper articles get us past WP:NCORP yet - a couple are local, a couple aren't quite about the company. Better than nothing though. SportingFlyer T·C 01:33, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Concur with others that the offered sourcing doesn't quite meet the more stricter criteria found in WP:NCORP. Let'srun (talk) 16:14, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.