Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Crap

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete le crap. Mailer Diablo 17:08, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Le Crap

Nonsense, but not patent nonsense. Hoax. Originally prod'd, but prod removed w/o comment. -- JLaTondre 15:22, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the name of the article completely sums up the content. Keresaspa 15:49, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the article asserts its own lack of notability: "...only been practiced by two student artists..." Slowmover 16:32, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Patent nonsense. Delete, candidate for speedy deletion. - Mike Rosoft 18:55, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Le delete as WP:NFT and nonsense. --Kinu ^t/_c 19:17, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Nonsense. Gflor e s^Talk 19:18, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. per above. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 19:22, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. SoLando (Talk) 21:37, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as something made up in Le Crap school one day. --Lockley 22:34, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 19:28, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is obviously not a hoax. Should we have deleted Pablo Picasso's entry because it was not popular at the time? Besides, if we complain that we want to delete it, we are just bringing attention to it. If we just ignore it, no one would really notice.--1028 16:33, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If Wikipedia existed in the early twentieth century and you posted an article about Picaso before he became famous, or if anyone else did, it should have been deleted because it is impossible tl tell for sure who will be a famous artist or musician. Someone would eventually notice this article, and only good articles should be in Wikipedia. Academic Challenger 21:53, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.