Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lazos de amor (2016 telenovela)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 03:35, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lazos de amor (2016 telenovela)[edit]

Lazos de amor (2016 telenovela) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It is too early to make this article. Because still not confirmed if Angelique Boyer and Sebastián Rulli will be the protagonist. He has not even begun production of the telenovela, much less has confirmed the cast and evidence search the cast have not started, for more than 20 or 30 that have references to talk about this project. It is not known if performed or not. In 2013, it was confirmed that a remake of the telenovela "Simplemente María" would be done, but it was not until 2015 that confirmed and will take place. Besides Michelle Renaud also you want to be the star of this telenovela. I therefore ask that the article be deleted until at least begin production of the telenovela and there is a release date or promotional. Philip J Fry (talk) 18:23, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep.The article's references say otherwise,Michelle Renaud was not cast as the lead but he was given a role in Pasión y poder.So I don't get what the nominator is talking about.As the references state clearly production is set to happen in October or November since it will be a great production.Moreover,the telenovela is creating a buzz already.More importantly pages like La Tempestad were created months before it premiered so I why will this be out of the norm?Additionally the reasons given are based on rumours since citation was not given to support the argument given by the nominator and most importantly a page is always developed from a single word. Nyanchoka : talk to me 21:07, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In an interview Angelique Boyer said clearly that nothing is yet confirmed, that if called to star in the telenovela, but nothing is confirmed yet. And José Alberto Castro recently said "Pasión y poder" ends in April 2016. So Michelle Renaud could do the casting for the telenovela. In addition several of the references are from months ago, when this telenovela was announced. It is best to wait at least begin searching cast. Because if not then we would have to create, "La usurpadora (2016 telenovela)" which supposedly will be starring Anahí. The article seems irrelevant now. Current references prove nothing, plus it is not known whether the title will definitov "Lazos de amor" or changed. Better to wait, telenovelas have already been confirmed and then not performed before. So step with "Madre Sustituta" and then was canceled. Even with regard to "Madre Sustituta" they had thousands of reliable sources that ensured that the telenovela would be done, but then he never did. So it's best to wait to create "Lazos de amor (2016 telenovela)".--Philip J Fry (talk) 21:22, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The references I used are recent. If cancelled,which I doubt,the page may be deleted.Pages like Doña Bárbara, the article has been in its same state since earlier this year.So I don't get what Philip J Fry is talking about.It's just a matter of simple understanding.Most of the pages in "Category:Upcoming television series" most of the articles are in the same state as this one.Examples are;The Ranch (TV series), Mysticons (planned to premiere in 2017),Thirteen (TV series),Of Kings and Prophets and The One Percent (TV series),which are perfect examples of what I stated.Honestly this article meets WP:GNG. Nyanchoka : talk 2 me 22:53, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not going to use this to discuss with you. You do not want to understand anything, and I will not continue wasting my time to explain anything. Other users decide if the article remains or not. For I see that you're going to start taking a thousand things that have nothing to do here.--Philip J Fry (talk) 23:20, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Nominator,You seem to forget anyone has his /her own opinion over here so its not a matter of making me understand.What I understand is what I think is write.Regrettably arguing with you has never been fun.So remain civil in such discussions.Irrelevance comes with your arguments.So I leave till,a comment has been dropped by any other user. Nyanchoka : talk 2 me 23:39, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • ”'Delete:”' Only I confirmed that the telenovela would be done, but still has not decided whether Angelique Boyer and Sebastián Rulli will be the protagonists. Besides this falls WP:CRYSTAL BALL. May be thousands of references that talk about the same, but that proves nothing. --Elreysintrono (talk) 16:46, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:07, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:07, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draft and userfy for now as I would say keep because these telenovelas almost always happen. SwisterTwister talk 04:57, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:00, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: This is an STUB, it doesn't needs to be here until something is really confirmed about the telenovela, It is too early to say that Sebastián Rulli and Angelique Boyer are the stars of this telenovelas. It's best to delete it and in one of the news the supossed "actress" says that the telenovela isn't confirmed, so delete this is an innecessary STUB. AND A COMMENT, this fight between Nyanchoka and Phillip J. Fry is silly, I think admin should fix that because I got a notice that I was a sockpuppet and that is FAKE. MEOW ElGatoSaez (talk) 00:42, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.