Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawson Lunde

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:07, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lawson Lunde

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable: out of the sources in the article, neither can contribute to passing WP:GNG (1: database entry, not significant coverage, 2: interview, not independent). During a WP:BEFORE, only one source came up that might satisfy contributing to GNG: [1]. However, this is a local news source with a writer that may possibly be a relative of Lunde's (same last name). Based on this lack of sourcing, I think this fails WP:NMUSICIAN and WP:NBIO. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 13:54, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and United States of America. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 13:54, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:30, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The one sources they cite reads like a family produced obituary and the only ones I found on google were publishers' blurbs on sites selling his sheet music. Though there is a review of his Sonata [2] from an academic site. We just don't have enough independent, reliable sources for an article. Eluchil404 (talk) 01:59, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.