Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawrence Ricci

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 09:09, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lawrence Ricci[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article shouldn't be on Wikipedia due to the fact that this person is not the concern of people on the internet. This is not a note worth topic and should frankly be removed. From a family member of Lawrence. Manoftheyear24 (talk) 07:27, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No WP:DELREASON is given. Appears notable as an alleged prominent member of the Genovese Crime Family based on sources in the article plus those found in my WP:BEFORE (e.g., 1 2 3 4). Cannot merge to Genovese Crime Family as that article is already too long. Appears also to be an unusual/prominent murder case as it was the last murder on the NYC waterfront and remains unsolved. I think a rename to "The murder of Lawrence Ricci" might be justified purely on WP:ONEEVENT grounds, as his murder appears to be the thing that makes him most notable. FOARP (talk) 08:26, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:49, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:49, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:49, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Sources in the article combined with those found by FOARP appear to indicate a GNG pass. Hog Farm (talk) 19:21, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - good sourcing. Notable also per WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 08:43, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.