Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawrence G. Costanzo (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Lawrence G. Costanzo[edit]
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Lawrence G. Costanzo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject lacks notability under the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Article survived a 2007 AfD but notability thresholds can change. Let'srun (talk) 21:49, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, Religion, and Arizona. Let'srun (talk) 21:49, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Zero coverage for this person, neither position is notable without an extensive sourcing to back it up. There has been no coverage added since 2007, so I don't expect notability. Oaktree b (talk) 22:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Why is this person notable? TechBear | Talk | Contributions 15:06, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG. SportingFlyer T·C 20:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.