Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawrence A weber
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 07:46, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Lawrence A weber (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Contested prod. Article appears to be essentially a resume/CV, with no obvious claim of notability and no reference to any reliable sources. JavaTenor 21:47, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Claims to have written articles on Lincoln and Stonewall Jackson. No Ghits for these. No other claim to notability. Canuckle 22:32, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. High School teacher, several apparently minor papers, now going for a doctorate. Probably his papers are not sufficient for academic notability--though there probably have been a ffew exceptions, especially in earlier centuries. A high school teacher could also be notable for professional prominence among high schools teachers, as shown by awards & positions in professional association, but there doesn't seem to be any of this here. DGG 23:29, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- David Eppstein 01:13, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- actually pretty well-written for a short article that lays out the subject's bio, training, research interests, and honors. But none of them amount to nearly "Average Professor" at this point, so WP:PROF doesn't apply, and I don't see anything in the standard WP:BIO which would fit. Finding reliable sources seems like it would be impossible. -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 01:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per WP:NN, WP:BIO, and WP:PROF --RandomHumanoid(⇒) 03:28, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Does not seem particularly unusual for a secondary school educator; I see nothing here that would pass WP:PROF. —David Eppstein 20:28, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.