Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Law Relating to Dowry Prohibition Cruelty and Harassment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dowry law in India. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:43, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Law Relating to Dowry Prohibition Cruelty and Harassment[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable legal reference work. InShaneee (talk) 08:38, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. The article advertises a lawbook that covers dowry law in India. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 21:48, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think this is a likely search term, or that it should be tagged with {{R with possibilities}}? This doesn't strike me as a good candidate for redirecting. --BDD (talk) 00:46, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Usually, I figure that when a new article like this is made, it's because somebody didn't find what they were looking for. Whatever else, somebody who could put their finger on this text could use it to improve that article. I generally figure this is good enough for a redirect. The book itself probably is too arcane to be notable; then again one of these days I should start an article on Blakemore on Prohibition. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 05:16, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.