Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Witzke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Daniel (talk) 21:55, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lauren Witzke[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed fringe candidate fails WP:NPOL. Not notable as a ""journalist"" either. If no consensus to delete, redirect to 2020 United States Senate election in Delaware. KidAd • SPEAK 18:31, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:30, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:31, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:31, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as they seem to be covered widely enough in the media. Mathmo ^Talk 06:15, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 20:48, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect: The sources that exist seem to just be routine election profiles and there wasn't anything specially notable that occurred. Curbon7 (talk) 11:45, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 21:13, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The subject appears to have 10+ reliable sources mentioning or covering them including NYT, Chicago Tribute, Haaretz, etc though none I found are dedicated articles, but they appear to be above trivial mentions. Per WP:NPOL '"Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the general notability guideline."' It appears to me that this person meets WP:GNG due to receiving "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." I suggest a Wikipedian politician expert should vote as well before a decision is reached. CosmicNotes (talk) 08:11, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, per person above ⬆️ Sahaib (talk) 20:07, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.