Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauran Bethell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Thanks to the sourcing done by Megalibrarygirl. WP:BEFORE is mandatory. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor ^Talk! 02:21, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lauran Bethell

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. Being quoted in passing on a bunch of Christian websites and speaking at a conference doth not notability make. The Drover's Wife (talk) 11:02, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Ascii002 (talk · contribs · guestbook) 12:06, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. -- Ascii002 (talk · contribs · guestbook) 12:06, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There is way more to this woman than just passing mentions in Christian websites. Please do WP:BEFORE. She is respected, testified before congress and yes, as a Christian she does show up in Christian journals, which is to be expected. Passes GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:50, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Being "respected" is not an explanation for why she somehow manages to pass WP:BIO, nor is testifying before Congress. Tons of non-notable people testify before Congress. The Drover's Wife (talk)
  - It is important, actually. Did you look at any of the resources I found? She was called in to testify because she is considered an expert on the topic by Congress. That leads to notability. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 14:44, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - I forgot to add that she's also written about significantly in several RS, so she passes GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 14:49, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 06:12, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I could not figure out how this article got here until I looked at its history and realized that Megalibrarygirl had improved the article enormously! Definitely passes GNC. --MurderByDeadcopy^"bang!" 02:34, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Well written and well referenced article on an important and notable person. Martinogk (talk) 09:13, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non notable activist, Sources are pretty crap and I'm finding nothing but mentions, Some activists are notable and some like this BLP aren't. –Davey2010^Talk 00:47, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.