Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Stack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:52, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Stack

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This biography does not appear to meet Wikipedia:Notability (people). Having published books, is not in itself a claim to notability either. Nor working for an apparently non-notable organization. My searches have only turned up (loads of ) advertorials and Infomercials which are not RS or independent and thus not really suitable as references. It almost reads as spam too. Aspro (talk) 17:51, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This reason this so much looks like a like a ghost-written Autobiography because is appears to have paid for be the subject herself... looky here (5th job down [1]. Similar looking article by same editor. Dianna Booher. Also, without proper sources.--Aspro (talk) 18:38, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sources are generally not really about her, so I don't think they are significant coverage. Sources don't show she meets WP:AUTHOR. Christopher Connor (talk) 19:40, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Relisting comment: Was not added to deletion log when originally nominated.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, January (talk) 23:27, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No significant coverage in multiple reliable sources, no evidence that the subject meets any notability criteria; done deal. I see no reason to fuel the syndrome where non-notable people think that a short cut to a Wikipedia article is to pay a flack to create one. Ravenswing 14:44, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:01, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:01, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:58, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.